IWB vs SUSA: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWB and SUSA hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and SUSA returned +17.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $4.1bn for iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF.
IWB costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; IWB is 12.0 times larger.
| IWB | SUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Net assets | $49.6bn | $4.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.6% | +17.6% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | MSCI USA Extended ESG Select Index |
| Holdings in common | 58% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 32.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SUSA hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
58% in common
On the same fields
IWB and SUSA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About SUSA
SUSA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 204 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SUSA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and SUSA +17.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or SUSA?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against SUSA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-susa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWB against SUSA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-susa
[IWB against SUSA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-susa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.