IMTM vs MFSI: Differences, Returns & Fees
IMTM and MFSI hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and IMTM returned +13.1% over the year. Net assets: $4.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF, and $1.1bn on May 31, 2026 for MFS Active International ETF.
IMTM costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.
| IMTM | MFSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, IMTM as of Oct 20, 2026 and MFSI as of May 31, 2026 | $4.2bn | $1.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +11.4% |
| What it tracks | MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.3% | 27.9% |
| Below its high | 5.8%, high on Aug 17, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IMTM and MFSI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
14% in common
On the same fields
IMTM and MFSI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IMTM
IMTM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 309 positions, with the top ten at 24.3%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About MFSI
MFSI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 93 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IMTM or MFSI?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMTM returned +13.1% and MFSI +11.4%.
- Which is cheaper, IMTM or MFSI?
- IMTM is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IMTM against MFSI, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-mfsi
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IMTM against MFSI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-mfsi
[IMTM against MFSI (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-mfsi)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.