IMTM vs INTF: Differences, Returns & Fees
IMTM and INTF hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and INTF returned +17.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $4.2bn for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF and $3.7bn for iShares International Equity Factor ETF.
INTF costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.4 points; IMTM is 1.1 times larger.
| IMTM | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.16% |
| Net assets | $4.2bn | $3.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +17.5% |
| What it tracks | MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index | STOXX International Equity Factor Index |
| Holdings in common | 41% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.3% | 12.7% |
| Below its high | 5.8%, high on Aug 17, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Sep 4, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
IMTM and INTF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IMTM follows MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index and INTF follows STOXX International Equity Factor Index.
- Holdings in common. 41% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 IMTM returned +13.1% and INTF +17.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.4 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IMTM and INTF hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
half
41% in common
On the same fields
IMTM and INTF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IMTM
IMTM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 309 positions, with the top ten at 24.3%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About INTF
INTF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.16% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 492 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IMTM or INTF?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMTM returned +13.1% and INTF +17.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IMTM or INTF?
- INTF is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IMTM against INTF, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-intf
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IMTM against INTF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-intf
[IMTM against INTF (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-intf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.