CGIC vs IMTM: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGIC and IMTM hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and CGIC returned +15.3% over the year. Net assets: $2.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF, and $4.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF.
IMTM costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; IMTM is 1.6 times larger.
| CGIC | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $2.6bn | $4.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.3% | +13.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index |
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.0% | 24.3% |
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 5.8%, high on Aug 17, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGIC and IMTM hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
19% in common
On the same fields
CGIC and IMTM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGIC
CGIC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +15.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 26.0%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About IMTM
IMTM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 309 positions, with the top ten at 24.3%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGIC or IMTM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGIC returned +15.3% and IMTM +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGIC or IMTM?
- IMTM is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGIC against IMTM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-imtm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGIC against IMTM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-imtm
[CGIC against IMTM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-imtm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.