CGIC vs HEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGIC and HEFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HEFA returned +19.3% over the year. Net assets: $2.6bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF, and $7.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF.

HEFA costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points.

CGICHEFA
Expense ratio0.54%0.35%
Net assets, CGIC as of Oct 8, 2026 and HEFA as of Oct 9, 2026$2.6bn$7.5bn
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+19.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.0%100.0%
Below its high3.8%, high on Aug 25, 20263.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+17.8%
CGIC total return, 1 year
+19.3%
HEFA total return, 1 year
0.54%
CGIC expense ratio
0.35%
HEFA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGIC and HEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGIC HEFA
Only in CGIC
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 5.83%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.98%
MediaTek Inc 2.83%
ASML Holding NV 2.74%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.46%
SK hynix Inc 2.25%
TotalEnergies SE 2.01%
AstraZeneca PLC 1.83%
Only in HEFA
ISHARES MSCI EAFE ETF 99.10%
EUR/USD 0.52%
JPY/USD 0.26%
GBP/USD 0.07%
DKK/USD 0.02%
JPY/USD 0.01%
SEK/USD 0.01%
SGD/USD 0.01%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGIC
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +17.8% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +0.5 pts +2.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 2.5% 0.0%
Holdings 192 97
Net assets, CGIC as of Oct 8, 2026 and HEFA as of Oct 9, 2026 $2.6bn $7.5bn

CGIC and HEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CGIC in plain words

CGIC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 26.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

HEFA in plain words

HEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGIC or HEFA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGIC returned +17.8% and HEFA +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, CGIC or HEFA?
HEFA is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGIC and HEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 2% of CGIC and 0% of HEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGIC against HEFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-hefa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.