CGIE vs HEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGIE and HEFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HEFA returned +19.3% over the year. Net assets: $2.4bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group International Equity ETF, and $7.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF.

HEFA costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.

CGIEHEFA
Expense ratio0.54%0.35%
Net assets, CGIE as of Oct 8, 2026 and HEFA as of Oct 9, 2026$2.4bn$7.5bn
Total return, 1 year+8.5%+19.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.7%100.0%
Below its high5.0%, high on Aug 13, 20263.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+8.5%
CGIE total return, 1 year
+19.3%
HEFA total return, 1 year
0.54%
CGIE expense ratio
0.35%
HEFA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGIE and HEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGIE HEFA
Only in CGIE
ASML Holding NV 4.72%
TotalEnergies SE 3.55%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 3.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.92%
AstraZeneca PLC 2.69%
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC 2.26%
Engie SA 2.17%
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB 2.14%
Only in HEFA
ISHARES MSCI EAFE ETF 99.10%
EUR/USD 0.52%
JPY/USD 0.26%
GBP/USD 0.07%
DKK/USD 0.02%
JPY/USD 0.01%
SEK/USD 0.01%
SGD/USD 0.01%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGIE
Capital Group International Equity ETF
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +8.5% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −8.8 pts +2.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 73 97
Net assets, CGIE as of Oct 8, 2026 and HEFA as of Oct 9, 2026 $2.4bn $7.5bn

CGIE and HEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CGIE in plain words

CGIE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +8.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 73 positions, with the top ten at 27.7%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

HEFA in plain words

HEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGIE or HEFA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGIE returned +8.5% and HEFA +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, CGIE or HEFA?
HEFA is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGIE and HEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CGIE and 0% of HEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGIE against HEFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgie-vs-hefa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.