CGIC vs CGXU: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGIC and CGXU hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and CGXU returned +18.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $2.6bn for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF and $6.8bn for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF.

Both cost 0.54% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; CGXU is 2.7 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CGICCGXU
Expense ratio0.54%0.54%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$2.6bn$6.8bn
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+18.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.0%38.4%
Below its high3.8%, high on Aug 25, 20265.1%, high on Sep 8, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

+17.8%
CGIC total return, 1 year
+18.6%
CGXU total return, 1 year
0.54%
CGIC expense ratio
0.54%
CGXU expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGIC and CGXU hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

half

27% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGIC CGXU
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.98% 3.54%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.46% 3.10%
ASML Holding NV 2.74% 2.44%
SK hynix Inc 2.25% 3.27%
Airbus SE 1.05% 2.11%
Nestle SA 1.03% 1.05%
AIA Group Ltd 0.92% 1.10%
Engie SA 0.80% 1.12%
Cenovus Energy Inc 0.75% 2.24%
Siemens AG 0.97% 0.74%
Glencore PLC 1.08% 0.70%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.68% 1.27%
Only in CGIC
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 5.83%
MediaTek Inc 2.83%
TotalEnergies SE 2.01%
AstraZeneca PLC 1.83%
BAE Systems PLC 1.71%
UniCredit SpA 1.39%
British American Tobacco PLC 1.25%
Barrick Mining Corp 1.04%
Only in CGXU
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 6.83%
SoftBank Group Corp 6.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd 5.12%
Anglo American PLC 1.68%
Lundin Mining Corp 1.59%
ARM Holdings PLC 1.57%
British American Tobacco PLC 1.44%
Reliance Industries Ltd 1.25%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGIC
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.8% +18.6%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +0.5 pts +1.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.54%
Already in the S&P 500 2.5% 0.0%
Holdings 192 73
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $2.6bn $6.8bn

CGIC and CGXU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CGIC in plain words

CGIC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 26.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

CGXU in plain words

CGXU is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 73 positions, with the top ten at 38.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 8, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGIC or CGXU?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGIC returned +17.8% and CGXU +18.6%.
Which is cheaper, CGIC or CGXU?
Neither: CGIC and CGXU both charge 0.54% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGIC and CGXU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 2% of CGIC and 0% of CGXU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGIC against CGXU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-cgxu

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.