CGXU vs FEOE: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGXU and FEOE hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and FEOE returned +20.2% over the year. Net assets: $6.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF, and $1.3bn on May 31, 2026 for First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF.
FEOE costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points; CGXU is 4.7 times larger.
| CGXU | FEOE | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $6.2bn | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.2% | +20.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not published |
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 38.4% | 30.4% |
| Below its high | 8.9%, high on Sep 8, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
CGXU and FEOE are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGXU follows No index, actively managed and FEOE follows not published.
- Holdings in common. 8% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 CGXU returned +12.2% and FEOE +20.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.0 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGXU and FEOE hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
8% in common
On the same fields
CGXU and FEOE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGXU
CGXU is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 73 positions, with the top ten at 38.4%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Sep 8, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About FEOE
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 3% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 30.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGXU or FEOE?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGXU returned +12.2% and FEOE +20.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGXU or FEOE?
- FEOE is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGXU against FEOE, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgxu-vs-feoe
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGXU against FEOE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgxu-vs-feoe
[CGXU against FEOE (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgxu-vs-feoe)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.