CGXU vs ILOW: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGXU and ILOW hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and CGXU returned +18.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $6.8bn for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF and $1.8bn for AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF.

ILOW costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points; CGXU is 3.8 times larger.

CGXUILOW
Expense ratio0.54%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$6.8bn$1.8bn
Total return, 1 year+18.6%+9.0%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common10%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.4%20.7%
Below its high5.1%, high on Sep 8, 20264.9%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

+18.6%
CGXU total return, 1 year
+9.0%
ILOW total return, 1 year
0.54%
CGXU expense ratio
0.50%
ILOW expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGXU and ILOW hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

half

10% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGXU ILOW
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 6.83% 2.50%
ASML Holding NV 2.44% 2.87%
Hitachi Ltd 1.62% 1.34%
AIA Group Ltd 1.10% 1.00%
Anglo American PLC 1.68% 0.73%
RELX PLC 0.62% 1.27%
Industria de Diseno Textil SA 0.62% 1.44%
Danone SA 0.55% 0.90%
Only in CGXU
SoftBank Group Corp 6.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd 5.12%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 3.54%
SK hynix Inc 3.27%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 3.10%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 3.00%
Novo Nordisk A/S 2.46%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 2.29%
Only in ILOW
Prysmian SpA 2.13%
Schneider Electric SE 2.10%
BAE Systems PLC 1.98%
Novartis AG 1.95%
AIB Group PLC 1.79%
Roche Holding AG 1.78%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd 1.78%
ABB Ltd 1.77%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
ILOW
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +18.6% +9.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +1.4 pts −8.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.6%
Holdings 73 84
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $6.8bn $1.8bn

CGXU and ILOW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CGXU in plain words

CGXU is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 73 positions, with the top ten at 38.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 8, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

ILOW in plain words

ILOW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 1% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 84 positions, with the top ten at 20.7%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGXU or ILOW?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGXU returned +18.6% and ILOW +9.0%.
Which is cheaper, CGXU or ILOW?
ILOW is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGXU and ILOW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CGXU and 1% of ILOW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGXU against ILOW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgxu-vs-ilow

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.