CWI vs HEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

CWI and HEFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HEFA returned +19.3% over the year. Net assets: $2.9bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF, and $7.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF.

CWI costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points.

CWIHEFA
Expense ratio0.30%0.35%
Net assets, CWI as of Oct 8, 2026 and HEFA as of Oct 9, 2026$2.9bn$7.5bn
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+19.3%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.1%100.0%
Below its high3.9%, high on Sep 4, 20263.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+17.8%
CWI total return, 1 year
+19.3%
HEFA total return, 1 year
0.30%
CWI expense ratio
0.35%
HEFA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CWI and HEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CWI HEFA
Only in CWI
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFAC 3.38%
SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S 2.64%
ASML HOLDING NV 2.00%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR SP ADR 1.96%
SK HYNIX INC 1.88%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.93%
ROCHE HOLDING AG 0.85%
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 0.85%
Only in HEFA
ISHARES MSCI EAFE ETF 99.10%
EUR/USD 0.52%
JPY/USD 0.26%
GBP/USD 0.07%
DKK/USD 0.02%
JPY/USD 0.01%
SEK/USD 0.01%
SGD/USD 0.01%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CWI
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +17.8% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +0.6 pts +2.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1110 97
Net assets, CWI as of Oct 8, 2026 and HEFA as of Oct 9, 2026 $2.9bn $7.5bn

CWI and HEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CWI in plain words

CWI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,110 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

HEFA in plain words

HEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CWI or HEFA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CWI returned +17.8% and HEFA +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, CWI or HEFA?
CWI is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CWI and HEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CWI and 0% of HEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CWI against HEFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cwi-vs-hefa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.