CWI vs DIHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

CWI and DIHP hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and CWI returned +17.8% over the year. Net assets: $2.9bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF, and $6.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional International High Profitability ETF.

DIHP costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points.

CWIDIHP
Expense ratio0.30%0.27%
Net assets, CWI as of Oct 8, 2026 and DIHP as of Jul 31, 2026$2.9bn$6.4bn
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+13.3%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.1%18.8%
Below its high3.9%, high on Sep 4, 20264.9%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+17.8%
CWI total return, 1 year
+13.3%
DIHP total return, 1 year
0.30%
CWI expense ratio
0.27%
DIHP expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CWI and DIHP hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

27% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CWI DIHP
ROCHE HOLDING AG 0.85% 3.53%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.65% 0.95%
NESTLE SA REG 0.65% 1.98%
BHP GROUP LTD 0.60% 1.57%
ALLIANZ SE REG 0.55% 0.72%
ADVANTEST CORP 0.52% 1.25%
TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 0.50% 1.28%
TOTALENERGIES SE 0.48% 0.52%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD 0.48% 0.53%
HITACHI LTD 0.48% 0.90%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 0.48% 0.84%
ROLLS ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 0.46% 1.09%
Only in CWI
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFAC 3.38%
SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S 2.64%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR SP ADR 1.96%
SK HYNIX INC 1.88%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.93%
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 0.85%
SHELL PLC 0.78%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GRO 0.69%
Only in DIHP
ASML Holding N.V. 3.51%
Novartis AG 1.44%
BP P.L.C. 1.10%
UNILEVER PLC 0.99%
SUNBELT RENTALS HOLDINGS, INC. 0.65%
BHP GROUP LIMITED 0.62%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.39%
DIAGEO PLC 0.38%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CWI
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
DIHP
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.8% +13.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +0.6 pts −4.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.27%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1110 519
Net assets, CWI as of Oct 8, 2026 and DIHP as of Jul 31, 2026 $2.9bn $6.4bn

CWI and DIHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CWI in plain words

CWI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,110 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

DIHP in plain words

DIHP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 519 positions, with the top ten at 18.8%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CWI or DIHP?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CWI returned +17.8% and DIHP +13.3%.
Which is cheaper, CWI or DIHP?
DIHP is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CWI and DIHP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CWI and 0% of DIHP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CWI against DIHP, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cwi-vs-dihp

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.