CWI vs DIHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
CWI and DIHP hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and CWI returned +17.8% over the year. Net assets: $2.9bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF, and $6.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional International High Profitability ETF.
DIHP costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points.
| CWI | DIHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.27% |
| Net assets, CWI as of Oct 8, 2026 and DIHP as of Jul 31, 2026 | $2.9bn | $6.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.8% | +13.3% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 16.1% | 18.8% |
| Below its high | 3.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | 4.9%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CWI and DIHP hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
27% in common
On the same fields
CWI and DIHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CWI in plain words
CWI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,110 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
DIHP in plain words
DIHP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 519 positions, with the top ten at 18.8%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CWI or DIHP?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CWI returned +17.8% and DIHP +13.3%.
- Which is cheaper, CWI or DIHP?
- DIHP is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CWI against DIHP, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cwi-vs-dihp
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CWI against DIHP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cwi-vs-dihp
[CWI against DIHP (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cwi-vs-dihp)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.