A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

FTSM vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees

On Jul 31, 2026 FTSM's duration was 0.7 years and IBTG's 0.2; IBTG charges 0.07% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $6.7bn for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF and $1.9bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FTSM and IBTG

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IBTG costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; FTSM is 3.6 times larger.

FTSM vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees
FTSMIBTG
Expense ratio0.29%0.07%
Net assets$6.7bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.4%+3.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index
Holdings in commonnot published
+3.4%
FTSM total return, 1 year
+3.6%
IBTG total return, 1 year
0.29%
FTSM expense ratio
0.07%
IBTG expense ratio

Get FTSM and IBTG fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-B2A4357864

FTSM and IBTG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FTSM follows No index, actively managed and IBTG follows ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index.
  2. Number of holdings. FTSM holds 740 positions and IBTG holds 10.
  3. Cost. FTSM charges 0.29% of assets a year and IBTG 0.07%, a gap of 0.22 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

FTSM
First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF
IBTG
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer First Trust iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.4% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.9% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +5.4 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.07%
Holdings 740 10
Net assets $6.7bn $1.9bn

FTSM and IBTG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FTSM

FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.

About IBTG

IBTG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTSM or IBTG?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTSM returned +3.4% and IBTG +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, FTSM or IBTG?
IBTG is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
FTSM vs PULSFTSM vs SHVFTSM vs JPSTFTSM vs SGOVIBTG vs JPSTIBTG vs TFLOIBTG vs TBILGBIL vs IBTG
FTSM on its own →IBTG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FTSM dividend history →FTSM holdings →IBTG dividend history →IBTG holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
FTSM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FTSM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗First Trust page for FTSM ↗IBTG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IBTG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IBTG ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTSM against IBTG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-ibtg

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.