BILS vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILS's duration was 0.4 years on Jun 30, 2026 and IBTG's 0.2 on Jul 31, 2026; IBTG charges 0.07% to BILS's 0.14%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.9bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF and $1.9bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF.
IBTG costs 0.07 points a year less; both returned +3.6% over a year; BILS is 2.1 times larger.
| BILS | IBTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.07% |
| Net assets | $3.9bn | $1.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +3.6% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
BILS and IBTG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BILS follows not read by ETFIQ and IBTG follows ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BILS returned +3.6% and IBTG +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.0 points.
- Number of holdings (similar). BILS holds 23 positions and IBTG holds 10.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BILS and IBTG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BILS
BILS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About IBTG
IBTG tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BILS or IBTG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILS returned +3.6% and IBTG +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BILS or IBTG?
- IBTG is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BILS against IBTG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bils-vs-ibtg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BILS against IBTG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bils-vs-ibtg
[BILS against IBTG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bils-vs-ibtg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.