Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or IBTG?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and IBTG +3.6%.

Which is cheaper, FLTR or IBTG?

IBTG is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

FLTR vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees

On Jul 31, 2026 FLTR's duration was 0.0 years and IBTG's 0.2; IBTG charges 0.07% to FLTR's 0.14%. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FLTR and IBTG

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IBTG costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; FLTR is 1.9 times larger.

FLTR vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees
	FLTR	IBTG
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.07%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026	$3.6bn	$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+4.7%	+3.6%
What it tracks	MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index	ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

+4.7%

FLTR total return, 1 year

+3.6%

IBTG total return, 1 year

0.14%

FLTR expense ratio

0.07%

IBTG expense ratio

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-0AFBAB2B6C

FLTR and IBTG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and IBTG follows ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index.
Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
Number of holdings. FLTR holds 455 positions and IBTG holds 10.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLTR and IBTG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FLTR IBTG

Only in FLTR

Commonwealth Bank of Australia, due Mar 14, 2030 1.26%

HSBC Holdings PLC, due May 13, 2031 1.08%

HSBC Holdings PLC, due Mar 10, 2032 1.06%

Westpac Banking Corp, due Jun 12, 2031 1.03%

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc, due Sep 12, 2031 0.84%

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Ltd, due Mar 13, 2030 0.83%

Abbott Laboratories, due Mar 9, 2029 0.83%

Amazon.com Inc, due Mar 13, 2029 0.82%

Only in IBTG

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Sep 30, 2026 6.46%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Oct 31, 2026 6.10%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Aug 31, 2026 5.71%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 30, 2026 5.62%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Sep 30, 2026 5.29%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Oct 31, 2026 5.27%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 30, 2026 5.13%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Aug 15, 2026 5.03%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLTR

VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF

IBTG

iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer VanEck iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +4.7% +3.6%

Expense ratio 0.14% 0.07%

Holdings 455 10

Net assets, FLTR as of Oct 19, 2026 and IBTG as of Oct 20, 2026 $3.6bn $1.9bn

FLTR and IBTG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLTR

FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About IBTG

IBTG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or IBTG?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and IBTG +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, FLTR or IBTG?: IBTG is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FLTR vs VRIG FLTR vs XHLF FLTR vs TBUX FLTR vs GSST IBTG vs TFLO IBTG vs TBIL IBTG vs USFR IBTG vs PULS

FLTR on its own →IBTG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FLTR dividend history →FLTR holdings →IBTG dividend history →IBTG holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FLTR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLTR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗IBTG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IBTG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IBTG ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLTR against IBTG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-ibtg

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.