A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

GBIL vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees

GBIL's duration was 0.4 years on May 31, 2026 and IBTG's 0.2 on Jul 31, 2026; IBTG charges 0.07% to GBIL's 0.12%. Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about GBIL and IBTG

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IBTG costs 0.05 points a year less; both returned +3.6% over a year; GBIL is 4.2 times larger.

GBIL vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees
GBILIBTG
Expense ratio0.12%0.07%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026$7.9bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.6%+3.6%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.6%
GBIL total return, 1 year
+3.6%
IBTG total return, 1 year
0.12%
GBIL expense ratio
0.07%
IBTG expense ratio

Get IBTG's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-BDFE9B4019

GBIL and IBTG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. GBIL follows not read by ETFIQ and IBTG follows ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index.
  2. Number of holdings. GBIL holds 43 positions and IBTG holds 10.
  3. Size. GBIL has $7.9bn in net assets and IBTG $1.9bn (net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026); GBIL is 4.2 times larger.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
IBTG
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Goldman Sachs iShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.6% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.12% 0.07%
Holdings 43 10
Net assets, GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 and IBTG as of Oct 20, 2026 $7.9bn $1.9bn

GBIL and IBTG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

About IBTG

IBTG tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GBIL or IBTG?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GBIL returned +3.6% and IBTG +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, GBIL or IBTG?
IBTG is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
GBIL vs VRIGGBIL vs XHLFGBIL vs TBUXGBIL vs GSSTIBTG vs ICSHIBTG vs VUSBIBTG vs VBILIBTG vs USFR
GBIL on its own →IBTG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →GBIL dividend history →GBIL holdings →IBTG dividend history →IBTG holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
GBIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗GBIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Goldman Sachs website ↗IBTG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IBTG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IBTG ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GBIL against IBTG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gbil-vs-ibtg

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.