FLTR vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLTR's duration was 0.0 years on Jul 31, 2026 and JPST's 0.8 on May 31, 2026; FLTR charges 0.14% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, and $42.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF.
FLTR costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; JPST is 11.9 times larger.
| FLTR | JPST | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $3.6bn | $42.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
FLTR and JPST are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and JPST follows No index, actively managed.
- Size. FLTR has $3.6bn in net assets and JPST $42.8bn (net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026); JPST is 11.9 times larger.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLTR returned +4.7% and JPST +3.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.3 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
FLTR and JPST on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLTR
FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About JPST
JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or JPST?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and JPST +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FLTR or JPST?
- FLTR is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLTR against JPST, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-jpst
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLTR against JPST. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-jpst
[FLTR against JPST (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-jpst)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.