BILS vs FTSM: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILS's duration was 0.4 years on Jun 30, 2026 and FTSM's 0.7 on Jul 31, 2026; BILS charges 0.14% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.9bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF and $6.7bn for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF.
BILS costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; FTSM is 1.7 times larger.
| BILS | FTSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.29% |
| Net assets | $3.9bn | $6.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
BILS and FTSM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BILS follows not read by ETFIQ and FTSM follows No index, actively managed.
- Number of holdings. BILS holds 23 positions and FTSM holds 740.
- Cost. BILS charges 0.14% of assets a year and FTSM 0.29%, a gap of 0.15 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BILS and FTSM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BILS
BILS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About FTSM
FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BILS or FTSM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILS returned +3.6% and FTSM +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BILS or FTSM?
- BILS is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BILS against FTSM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bils-vs-ftsm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BILS against FTSM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bils-vs-ftsm
[BILS against FTSM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bils-vs-ftsm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.