FTSM vs GSY: Differences, Returns & Fees

On Jul 31, 2026 FTSM's duration was 0.7 years and GSY's 0.8; GSY charges 0.22% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $6.7bn for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF and $4.0bn for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FTSM and GSY

Answers cite the figures on this page.

GSY costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; FTSM is 1.7 times larger.

FTSM vs GSY: Differences, Returns & Fees
FTSMGSY
Expense ratio0.29%0.22%
Net assets$6.7bn$4.0bn
Total return, 1 year+3.4%+3.7%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonnot published
+3.4%
FTSM total return, 1 year
+3.7%
GSY total return, 1 year
0.29%
FTSM expense ratio
0.22%
GSY expense ratio

Get FTSM and GSY fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-BFADD242BF

FTSM and GSY are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
  2. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FTSM returned +3.4% and GSY +3.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.3 points.
  3. Number of holdings (similar). FTSM holds 740 positions and GSY holds 414.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

FTSM
First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.4% +3.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.9% (AGG) +3.7% (SPTU)
Gap to its benchmark +5.4 pts vs AGG 0.0 pts vs SPTU
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.22%
Holdings 740 414
Net assets $6.7bn $4.0bn

FTSM and GSY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FTSM

FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.

About GSY

GSY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +3.7% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.22% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTSM or GSY?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTSM returned +3.4% and GSY +3.7%.
Which is cheaper, FTSM or GSY?
GSY is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTSM against GSY, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-gsy

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.