FTSM vs ICSH: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 FTSM's duration was 0.7 years and ICSH's 0.7; ICSH charges 0.08% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $6.7bn for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF and $9.0bn for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF.
ICSH costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; ICSH is 1.3 times larger.
| FTSM | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.08% |
| Net assets | $6.7bn | $9.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.4% | +3.5% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
FTSM and ICSH are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Cost. FTSM charges 0.29% of assets a year and ICSH 0.08%, a gap of 0.21 points.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FTSM returned +3.4% and ICSH +3.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
FTSM and ICSH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FTSM
FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.
About ICSH
ICSH is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTSM or ICSH?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTSM returned +3.4% and ICSH +3.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FTSM or ICSH?
- ICSH is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTSM against ICSH, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-icsh
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FTSM against ICSH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-icsh
[FTSM against ICSH (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-icsh)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.