FTSM vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees

FTSM's duration was 0.7 years on Jul 31, 2026 and JPST's 0.8 on May 31, 2026; JPST charges 0.18% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $6.7bn for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF and $42.8bn for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FTSM and JPST

Answers cite the figures on this page.

JPST costs 0.11 points a year less; both returned +3.4% over a year; JPST is 6.4 times larger.

FTSM vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees
FTSMJPST
Expense ratio0.29%0.18%
Net assets$6.7bn$42.8bn
Total return, 1 year+3.4%+3.4%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.4%
FTSM total return, 1 year
+3.4%
JPST total return, 1 year
0.29%
FTSM expense ratio
0.18%
JPST expense ratio

Get FTSM and JPST fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-0E3671AC35

FTSM and JPST are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Cost. FTSM charges 0.29% of assets a year and JPST 0.18%, a gap of 0.11 points.
  2. Size. FTSM has $6.7bn in net assets and JPST $42.8bn (Net assets); JPST is 6.4 times larger.
  3. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

FTSM
First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.4% +3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.9% (AGG) −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +5.4 pts vs AGG +5.4 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.18%
Holdings 740 824
Net assets $6.7bn $42.8bn

FTSM and JPST on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FTSM

FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.

About JPST

JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTSM or JPST?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTSM returned +3.4% and JPST +3.4%.
Which is cheaper, FTSM or JPST?
JPST is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTSM against JPST, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-jpst

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.