JPST vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

JPST's duration was 0.8 years on May 31, 2026 and PULS's 0.7 on May 29, 2026; PULS charges 0.15% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets: $42.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 19, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about JPST and PULS

Answers cite the figures on this page.

PULS costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; JPST is 2.2 times larger.

JPST vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
JPSTPULS
Expense ratio0.18%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026$42.8bn$19.8bn
Total return, 1 year+3.4%+4.1%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

+3.4%
JPST total return, 1 year
+4.1%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.18%
JPST expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Get JPST and PULS fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-F9E32DCF73

JPST and PULS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
  2. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 JPST returned +3.4% and PULS +4.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.7 points.
  3. Number of holdings (similar). JPST holds 824 positions and PULS holds 553.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer JPMorgan PGIM
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.4% +4.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.9% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +5.4 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.15%
Holdings 824 553
Net assets, JPST as of Oct 20, 2026 and PULS as of Oct 19, 2026 $42.8bn $19.8bn

JPST and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About JPST

JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

About PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JPST or PULS?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JPST returned +3.4% and PULS +4.1%.
Which is cheaper, JPST or PULS?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JPST against PULS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jpst-vs-puls

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.