BILZ vs FTSM: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILZ's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and FTSM's 0.7 on Jul 31, 2026; BILZ charges 0.14% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $6.7bn on Oct 20, 2026 for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF.
BILZ costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.
| BILZ | FTSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and FTSM as of Oct 20, 2026 | $1.0bn | $6.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
BILZ and FTSM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Cost. BILZ charges 0.14% of assets a year and FTSM 0.29%, a gap of 0.15 points.
- Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and FTSM $6.7bn (net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and FTSM as of Oct 20, 2026); FTSM is 6.7 times larger.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BILZ and FTSM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BILZ
BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About FTSM
FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or FTSM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and FTSM +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BILZ or FTSM?
- BILZ is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BILZ against FTSM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-ftsm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BILZ against FTSM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-ftsm
[BILZ against FTSM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-ftsm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.