BILZ vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees

BILZ's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL's 0.4 on May 31, 2026; GBIL charges 0.12% to BILZ's 0.14%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BILZ and GBIL

Answers cite the figures on this page.

GBIL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points.

BILZ vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILZGBIL
Expense ratio0.14%0.12%
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026$1.0bn$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+3.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+3.7%
BILZ total return, 1 year
+3.6%
GBIL total return, 1 year
0.14%
BILZ expense ratio
0.12%
GBIL expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-5CE7B16ED7

BILZ and GBIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BILZ follows No index, actively managed and GBIL follows not read by ETFIQ.
  2. Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and GBIL $7.9bn (net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026); GBIL is 7.9 times larger.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BILZ returned +3.7% and GBIL +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.12%
Holdings not counted 43
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 $1.0bn $7.9bn

BILZ and GBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BILZ

BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or GBIL?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and GBIL +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, BILZ or GBIL?
GBIL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BILZ against GBIL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-gbil

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.