BILZ vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILZ's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL's 0.4 on May 31, 2026; GBIL charges 0.12% to BILZ's 0.14%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.
GBIL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points.
| BILZ | GBIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.12% |
| Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 | $1.0bn | $7.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +3.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
BILZ and GBIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BILZ follows No index, actively managed and GBIL follows not read by ETFIQ.
- Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and GBIL $7.9bn (net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026); GBIL is 7.9 times larger.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BILZ returned +3.7% and GBIL +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BILZ and GBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BILZ
BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About GBIL
GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or GBIL?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and GBIL +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BILZ or GBIL?
- GBIL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BILZ against GBIL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-gbil
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BILZ against GBIL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-gbil
[BILZ against GBIL (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-gbil)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.