BILZ vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 BILZ's duration was 0.2 years and VUSB's 1.0; VUSB charges 0.10% to BILZ's 0.14%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.
VUSB costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; VUSB is 8.7 times larger.
| BILZ | VUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.0bn | $8.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
BILZ and VUSB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
- Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and VUSB $8.9bn (net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026); VUSB is 8.9 times larger.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BILZ and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
BILZ and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BILZ
BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About VUSB
VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or VUSB?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and VUSB +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BILZ or VUSB?
- VUSB is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BILZ against VUSB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-vusb
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BILZ against VUSB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-vusb
[BILZ against VUSB (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-vusb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.