Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBTG vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBTG returned +3.6% to MINT's +4.2%, and IBTG charges 0.07% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBTG and MINT
Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
IBTG costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.
| Measure | IBTG | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +4.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, IBTG as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.9bn | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 6, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 346 weekly returnsMINT returned more: +21.9% to +5.8%. MINT swung less: 1.7% to 3.0%. MINT fell less at its worst: −4.6% to −13.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IBTG | MINT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +5.8% | +21.9% | MINT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +0.8% | +3.0% | MINT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −11.5% | −1.1% | MINT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 3.0% | 1.7% | MINT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 2.3% | 1.5% | MINT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −13.1% | −4.6% | MINT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.70 | 0.01 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.93 | 0.01 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.06 | 0.66 | MINT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 346 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
IBTG and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBTG and MINT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IBTG follows ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index and MINT follows No index, actively managed.
- Number of holdings. IBTG holds 10 positions and MINT holds 977.
- Cost. IBTG charges 0.07% of assets a year and MINT 0.36%, a gap of 0.29 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IBTG
IBTG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IBTG or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBTG returned +3.6% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IBTG or MINT?
- IBTG is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBTG against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtg-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBTG against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtg-vs-mint
[IBTG against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtg-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.