Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BOXX vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOXX returned +4.0% to MINT's +4.2%, and BOXX charges 0.19% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BOXX and MINT
Net assets: $14.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
BOXX costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.
| Measure | BOXX | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +4.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, BOXX as of Oct 28, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $14.5bn | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
Jan 6, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 198 weekly returnsMINT returned more: +21.5% to +18.9%. BOXX swung less: 0.2% to 0.3%. BOXX fell less at its worst: −0.1% to −0.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BOXX | MINT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +18.9% | +21.5% | MINT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +4.6% | +5.2% | MINT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +18.6% | +1.7% | BOXX | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 0.2% | 0.3% | BOXX | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 0.2% | 0.2% | BOXX | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −0.1% | −0.1% | BOXX | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.25 | 1.52 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.35 | 2.23 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | Not measured | 37.19 | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 198 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BOXX and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BOXX and MINT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Cost. BOXX charges 0.19% of assets a year and MINT 0.36%, a gap of 0.17 points.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BOXX returned +4.0% and MINT +4.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BOXX
BOXX is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOXX or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOXX returned +4.0% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, BOXX or MINT?
- BOXX is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BOXX against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/boxx-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BOXX against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/boxx-vs-mint
[BOXX against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/boxx-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.