Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to PULS's +4.0%, and PULS charges 0.15% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and PULS
Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.
| Measure | MINT | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +4.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.4bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returnsPULS returned more: +32.2% to +28.2%. MINT swung less: 1.5% to 1.9%. MINT fell less at its worst: −4.6% to −5.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MINT | PULS | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +28.2% | +32.2% | PULS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.0% | +3.3% | PULS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −0.9% | −0.9% | MINT (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 1.5% | 1.9% | MINT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 1.3% | 1.6% | MINT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −4.6% | −5.9% | MINT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.10 | 0.27 | PULS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.11 | 0.32 | PULS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.64 | 0.57 | MINT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
MINT and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT and PULS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Cost. MINT charges 0.36% of assets a year and PULS 0.15%, a gap of 0.21 points.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MINT returned +4.2% and PULS +4.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-puls
[MINT against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.