Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BILZ vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BILZ returned +3.7% to MINT's +4.2%, and BILZ charges 0.14% to MINT's 0.36%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BILZ and MINT

Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $1.0bn for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund and $16.4bn for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+3.7%
BILZ total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.14%
BILZ expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BILZ costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; MINT is 16.4 times larger.

BILZ vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBILZMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+4.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.14%0.36%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$1.0bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 30, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 173 weekly returns
BILZ MINT
Return
Total return edge MINT +16.0% +18.3%
Annualized edge MINT +4.6% +5.2%
Price return edge MINT +0.7% +0.9%
Risk
Volatility edge BILZ 0.1% 0.3%
Max drawdown edge BILZ 0.0% −0.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MINT −0.58 1.83
Sortino edge MINT −0.80 2.81
Reading

MINT returned more: +18.3% to +16.0%. BILZ swung less: 0.1% to 0.3%. BILZ fell less at its worst: 0.0% to −0.1%.

Full scorecard

8 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BILZ vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBILZMINTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+16.0%+18.3%MINTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.6%+5.2%MINTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+0.7%+0.9%MINTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility0.1%0.3%BILZSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation0.1%0.2%BILZLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown0.0%−0.1%BILZDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.581.83MINTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.802.81MINTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 173 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BILZ and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BILZ MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BILZ
U.S. Treasury Bills, due Sep 24, 2026 45.05%
U.S. Treasury Bills, due Oct 27, 2026 26.38%
U.S. Treasury Bills, due Jul 21, 2026 21.33%
U.S. Treasury Bills, due Aug 4, 2026 15.43%
U.S. Treasury Bills, due Aug 18, 2026 13.15%
Only in MINT
U.S. Treasury Notes, due May 31, 2031 6.21%
Federal National Mortgage Association REMICS, due Sep 25, 2054 1.12%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. REMICS, due Nov 25, 2054 0.99%
Sumisho Air Lease Corp., due Aug 15, 2026 0.87%
HSBC Holdings PLC, due Jun 9, 2028 0.77%
AerCap Ireland Capital DAC/AerCap Global Aviation Trust, due Oct 29, 2026 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II, due Mar 26, 2031 0.71%
International Bank for Reconstruction & Development, due Sep 23, 2026 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer PIMCO PIMCO
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +4.2%
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.36%
Holdings not counted 977
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 $1.0bn $16.4bn

BILZ and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-16CD48BCCF

BILZ and MINT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
  2. Cost. BILZ charges 0.14% of assets a year and MINT 0.36%, a gap of 0.22 points.
  3. Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and MINT $16.4bn (net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026); MINT is 16.4 times larger.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BILZ

BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, BILZ or MINT?
BILZ is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BILZ against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.