FNDF vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDF and SCHF hold 64% of their weight in the same names, and FNDF returned +28.5% over the year. Net assets on May 31, 2026: $24.6bn for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF and $66.5bn for Schwab International Equity ETF.
SCHF costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; SCHF is 2.7 times larger.
| FNDF | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $24.6bn | $66.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +28.5% | +20.3% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| Holdings in common | 64% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 17.0% | 14.8% |
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | 4.6%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDF and SCHF hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
64% in common
On the same fields
FNDF and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDF in plain words
FNDF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 1% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 889 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SCHF in plain words
SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,476 positions, with the top ten at 14.8%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDF or SCHF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDF returned +28.5% and SCHF +20.3%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDF or SCHF?
- SCHF is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDF against SCHF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-schf
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FNDF against SCHF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-schf
[FNDF against SCHF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-schf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.