EFV vs FNDF: Differences, Returns & Fees
EFV and FNDF hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and FNDF returned +28.5% over the year. Net assets: $30.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF, and $24.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF.
FNDF costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points.
| EFV | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.31% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, EFV as of Oct 9, 2026 and FNDF as of May 31, 2026 | $30.1bn | $24.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.2% | +28.5% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 19.8% | 17.0% |
| Below its high | 5.9%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Sep 4, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EFV and FNDF hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
38% in common
On the same fields
EFV and FNDF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EFV in plain words
EFV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.31% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 397 positions, with the top ten at 19.8%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
FNDF in plain words
FNDF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 1% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 889 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EFV or FNDF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFV returned +21.2% and FNDF +28.5%.
- Which is cheaper, EFV or FNDF?
- FNDF is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EFV against FNDF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efv-vs-fndf
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). EFV against FNDF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efv-vs-fndf
[EFV against FNDF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efv-vs-fndf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.