FNDF vs GCOW: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDF and GCOW hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and FNDF returned +28.5% over the year. Net assets: $24.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF, and $3.4bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF.
FNDF costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points.
| FNDF | GCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, FNDF as of May 31, 2026 and GCOW as of Oct 2, 2026 | $24.6bn | $3.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +28.5% | +19.6% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend Index |
| Holdings in common | 17% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 17.0% | 20.5% |
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | 5.2%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDF and GCOW hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
17% in common
On the same fields
FNDF and GCOW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDF in plain words
FNDF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 1% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 889 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
GCOW in plain words
GCOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDF or GCOW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDF returned +28.5% and GCOW +19.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDF or GCOW?
- FNDF is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDF against GCOW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-gcow
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FNDF against GCOW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-gcow
[FNDF against GCOW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-gcow)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.