GCOW vs JIVE: Differences, Returns & Fees

GCOW and JIVE hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and JIVE returned +29.0% over the year. Net assets: $3.4bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF, and $4.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan International Value ETF.

JIVE costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; JIVE is 1.2 times larger.

GCOWJIVE
Expense ratio0.60%0.55%
Net assets, as of Oct 2, 2026$3.4bn$4.1bn
Total return, 1 year+19.6%+29.0%
What it tracksPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common14%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.5%16.8%
Below its high5.2%, high on Aug 25, 20265.7%, high on Sep 4, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+19.6%
GCOW total return, 1 year
+29.0%
JIVE total return, 1 year
0.60%
GCOW expense ratio
0.55%
JIVE expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GCOW and JIVE hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

14% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding GCOW JIVE
Nestle SA 1.99% 1.47%
Novartis AG 2.02% 1.11%
TotalEnergies SE 1.90% 1.00%
BP PLC 1.96% 0.83%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.01% 0.74%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 2.00% 0.64%
Sanofi SA 1.83% 0.63%
Enel SpA 1.95% 0.57%
ORLEN SA 1.43% 0.37%
Bridgestone Corp 0.65% 0.36%
Eni SpA 1.95% 0.34%
Orange SA 1.21% 0.32%
Only in GCOW
Unilever PLC 2.19%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.19%
Philip Morris International In 2.06%
Chevron Corp 2.02%
Medtronic PLC 2.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.98%
AT&T Inc 1.96%
Comcast Corp 1.93%
Only in JIVE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO 3.82%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR 2.66%
SHELL PLC 1.69%
ROCHE HOLDING AG COMMON 1.37%
TORONTO-DOMINION 1.33%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC COMMON 1.25%
ALLIANZ SE COMMON STOCK 1.03%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.02%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
JIVE
JPMorgan International Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +19.6% +29.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +2.3 pts +11.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.55%
Already in the S&P 500 21.5% 0.0%
Holdings 100 374
Net assets, GCOW as of Oct 2, 2026 and JIVE as of Oct 9, 2026 $3.4bn $4.2bn

GCOW and JIVE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

GCOW in plain words

GCOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

JIVE in plain words

JIVE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +29.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 16.8%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GCOW or JIVE?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GCOW returned +19.6% and JIVE +29.0%.
Which is cheaper, GCOW or JIVE?
JIVE is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GCOW and JIVE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of GCOW and 0% of JIVE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GCOW against JIVE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-jive

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.