FDVV vs FNDB: Differences, Returns & Fees
FDVV and FNDB hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and FNDB returned +23.6% over the year. Net assets: $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF, and $1.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF.
FDVV costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points.
| FDVV | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, FDVV as of Sep 30, 2026 and FNDB as of May 31, 2026 | $10.2bn | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.1% | +23.6% |
| What it tracks | Fidelity High Dividend Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 20.8% |
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and FNDB hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
27% in common
On the same fields
FDVV and FNDB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About FNDB
FNDB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,637 positions, with the top ten at 20.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or FNDB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +14.1% and FNDB +23.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or FNDB?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDVV against FNDB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-fndb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FDVV against FNDB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-fndb
[FDVV against FNDB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-fndb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.