FDVV vs LGLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

FDVV and LGLV hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned +14.1% over the year. Net assets: $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF, and $1.1bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF.

LGLV costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; FDVV is 9.1 times larger.

FDVV vs LGLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FDVVLGLV
Expense ratio0.15%0.12%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$10.2bn$1.1bn
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+3.3%
What it tracksFidelity High Dividend Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common15%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund33.8%15.8%
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 20266.4%, high on Jul 28, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+14.1%
FDVV total return, 1 year
+3.3%
LGLV total return, 1 year
0.15%
FDVV expense ratio
0.12%
LGLV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and LGLV hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

15% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FDVV LGLV
COCA COLA CO 1.96% 1.23%
SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.13% 1.16%
DUKE ENERGY CORP NEW 1.10% 1.36%
PEPSICO INC 1.37% 0.95%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.69% 0.89%
REALTY INCOME CORP 0.85% 1.63%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.88% 0.82%
APPLE INC 6.18% 0.78%
MCDONALDS CORP 1.36% 0.73%
VICI PPTYS INC 0.72% 0.79%
TJX COMPANIES INC 1.58% 0.60%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON 0.52% 1.04%
Only in FDVV
NVIDIA CORP 6.57%
BROADCOM INC 3.11%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.76%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.66%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.96%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.80%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.80%
BEST BUY CO INC 1.65%
Only in LGLV
WELLTOWER INC 4.43%
VIVMARK RESIDENTIAL 1.48%
CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC 1.16%
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GP 1.15%
CME GROUP INC 1.12%
TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 1.08%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.08%
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 1.07%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
LGLV
State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of High Dividend Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +3.3%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.12%
Already in the S&P 500 87.4% 83.1%
Holdings 95 171
Net assets, FDVV as of Sep 30, 2026 and LGLV as of Oct 8, 2026 $10.2bn $1.1bn

FDVV and LGLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FDVV

FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About LGLV

LGLV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 83% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 171 positions, with the top ten at 15.8%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or LGLV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +14.1% and LGLV +3.3%.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or LGLV?
LGLV is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and LGLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 83% of LGLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FDVV against LGLV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-lglv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.