FNDB vs RWL: Differences, Returns & Fees

FNDB and RWL hold 63% of their weight in the same names, and FNDB returned +23.6% over the year. Net assets: $1.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF, and $10.0bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF.

FNDB costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points; RWL is 6.9 times larger.

FNDB vs RWL: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDBRWL
Expense ratio0.25%0.39%
Net assets, as of May 31, 2026$1.3bn$9.1bn
Total return, 1 year+23.6%+21.1%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQS&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index
Holdings in common63%
Holdings datedMay 31, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.8%24.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+23.6%
FNDB total return, 1 year
+21.1%
RWL total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDB expense ratio
0.39%
RWL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDB and RWL hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

63% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FNDB RWL
Apple Inc 4.29% 2.50%
Microsoft Corp 2.16% 1.81%
Amazon.com Inc 1.72% 4.05%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.31% 1.97%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.28% 1.41%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.27% 2.18%
Alphabet Inc 2.20% 1.19%
Alphabet Inc 1.75% 1.19%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.15% 1.26%
Chevron Corp 1.37% 1.05%
Walmart Inc 0.94% 3.89%
CVS Health Corp 0.83% 1.88%
Only in FNDB
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.12%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc 0.30%
Honeywell International Inc 0.27%
Lumen Technologies Inc 0.20%
HF Sinclair Corp 0.12%
Ovintiv Inc 0.12%
Corteva Inc 0.11%
ONEOK Inc 0.10%
Only in RWL
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.88%
Honeywell International Inc 0.20%
ONEOK Inc 0.19%
Vylor Inc 0.08%
Honeywell Aerospace Inc 0.07%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.07%
Lululemon Athletica Inc 0.05%
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd 0.05%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +23.6% +21.1%
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.39%
Already in the S&P 500 84.4% 99.4%
Holdings 1637 505
Net assets, FNDB as of May 31, 2026 and RWL as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.3bn $10.0bn

FNDB and RWL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FNDB

FNDB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,637 positions, with the top ten at 20.8%.

About RWL

RWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 24.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDB or RWL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDB returned +23.6% and RWL +21.1%.
Which is cheaper, FNDB or RWL?
FNDB is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDB and RWL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of FNDB and 99% of RWL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDB against RWL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-rwl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.