Which returned more over the last year, FNDB or JAVA?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDB returned +23.6% and JAVA +20.3%.

Which is cheaper, FNDB or JAVA?

FNDB is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do FNDB and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 84% of FNDB and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

FNDB vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees

FNDB and JAVA hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and FNDB returned +23.6% over the year. Net assets: $1.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF, and $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.

FNDB costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points.

FNDB vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
	FNDB	JAVA
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.44%
Net assets, FNDB as of May 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026	$1.3bn	$7.2bn
Total return, 1 year	+23.6%	+20.3%
What it tracks	not read by ETFIQ	No index, actively managed
Holdings in common	38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	20.8%	30.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+23.6%

FNDB total return, 1 year

+20.3%

JAVA total return, 1 year

0.25%

FNDB expense ratio

0.44%

JAVA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDB and JAVA hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FNDB JAVA

Apple Inc 4.29% 3.93%

Microsoft Corp 2.16% 6.31%

Amazon.com Inc 1.72% 7.76%

Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.31% 1.32%

Chevron Corp 1.37% 1.22%

UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.27% 1.18%

Meta Platforms Inc 1.15% 1.55%

Johnson & Johnson 0.90% 1.28%

Bank of America Corp 0.80% 2.19%

Citigroup Inc 0.79% 1.39%

AT&T Inc 0.75% 0.70%

Merck & Co Inc 0.63% 0.78%

Only in FNDB

Exxon Mobil Corp 2.12%

Micron Technology Inc 1.48%

JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.28%

Verizon Communications Inc 0.92%

Cisco Systems Inc 0.84%

General Motors Co 0.67%

Pfizer Inc 0.64%

Broadcom Inc 0.60%

Only in JAVA

NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.89%

GATES INDUSTRIAL CORP 0.68%

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.66%

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD 0.31%

ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS 0.14%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FNDB

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF

JAVA

JPMorgan Active Value ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Schwab JPMorgan

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +23.6% +20.3%

Its benchmark over the same days not published +26.4% (IWD)

Gap to its benchmark not available −6.2 pts vs IWD

Expense ratio 0.25% 0.44%

Already in the S&P 500 84.4% 90.4%

Holdings 1637 151

Net assets, FNDB as of May 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.3bn $7.2bn

FNDB and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FNDB

FNDB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,637 positions, with the top ten at 20.8%.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDB or JAVA?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDB returned +23.6% and JAVA +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, FNDB or JAVA?: FNDB is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDB and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 84% of FNDB and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

FNDB vs SPYD FNDB vs SPLV FNDB vs FTCS DFLV vs FNDB JAVA vs RDIV JAVA vs SEIV JAVA vs LGLV JAVA vs TVAL

FNDB on its own →JAVA on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FNDB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FNDB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Schwab website ↗JAVA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗JAVA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗JPMorgan website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDB against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-java

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.