FNDB vs PRF: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDB and PRF hold 82% of their weight in the same names, and PRF returned +24.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF, and $10.0bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF.
FNDB costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points.
| FNDB | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.34% |
| Net assets, FNDB as of May 31, 2026 and PRF as of Oct 9, 2026 | $1.3bn | $10.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.6% | +24.8% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index |
| Holdings in common | 82% | |
| Holdings dated | May 31, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.8% | 23.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDB and PRF hold 82% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
82% in common
On the same fields
FNDB and PRF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FNDB
FNDB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,637 positions, with the top ten at 20.8%.
About PRF
PRF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,000 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDB or PRF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDB returned +23.6% and PRF +24.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDB or PRF?
- FNDB is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDB against PRF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-prf
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FNDB against PRF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-prf
[FNDB against PRF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-prf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.