FDL vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
FDL and JAVA hold 6% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $7.7bn for First Trust Morningstar ETF and $7.2bn for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.
FDL costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.
| FDL | JAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.43% | 0.44% |
| Net assets | $7.7bn | $7.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.6% | +20.3% |
| What it tracks | Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50.4% | 30.6% |
| Below its high | 5.9%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDL and JAVA hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
6% in common
On the same fields
FDL and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FDL
FDL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.43% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 50.4%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About JAVA
JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDL or JAVA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDL returned +20.6% and JAVA +20.3%.
- Which is cheaper, FDL or JAVA?
- FDL is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDL against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdl-vs-java
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FDL against JAVA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdl-vs-java
[FDL against JAVA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdl-vs-java)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.