JAVA vs PWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
JAVA and PWV hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and PWV returned +22.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $7.2bn for JPMorgan Active Value ETF and $1.8bn for Invesco Large Cap Value ETF.
JAVA costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; JAVA is 3.9 times larger.
| JAVA | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.55% |
| Net assets | $7.2bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.3% | +22.5% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index |
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 9, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 30.6% | 33.8% |
| Below its high | 6.5%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JAVA and PWV hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
21% in common
On the same fields
JAVA and PWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About JAVA
JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
About PWV
PWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JAVA or PWV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JAVA returned +20.3% and PWV +22.5%.
- Which is cheaper, JAVA or PWV?
- JAVA is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JAVA against PWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/java-vs-pwv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). JAVA against PWV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/java-vs-pwv
[JAVA against PWV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/java-vs-pwv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.