Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to QQQM's +15.2%; 48% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and QQQM

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.7 points.

FBCG vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.15%
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026$7.6bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
FBCG QQQM
Return
Total return edge QQQM +134.0% +157.2%
Annualized edge QQQM +15.2% +17.0%
Price return edge QQQM (slight) +133.5% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQM 24.0% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge QQQM −42.6% −35.0%
Downside capture 126.3% 99.8%
Beta 1.39 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM 0.57 0.70
Sortino edge QQQM 0.87 1.07
Treynor 0.121 0.147
Calmar edge QQQM 0.36 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.62
Information ratio 0.26 0.10
Tracking error 11.2% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +134.0%. QQQM swung less: 21.0% to 24.0%. QQQM fell less at its worst: −35.0% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+134.0%+157.2%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.2%+17.0%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+133.5%+147.9%QQQM (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.0%21.0%QQQMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.7%13.6%QQQMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−35.0%QQQMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.851.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.570.70QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.871.07QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.360.49QQQMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

48%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and QQQM hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

48% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG QQQM
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 8.17%
APPLE INC 9.31% 7.88%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 6.14%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86% 4.25%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 2.93%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 2.53%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 2.87%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 4.50%
TESLA INC 1.28% 3.33%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 3.93%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.97% 0.92%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.64% 0.65%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.80%
GE VERNOVA INC 0.77%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
Only in QQQM
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.89%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.21%
Amgen Inc 1.04%
Linde PLC 1.01%
Analog Devices Inc 0.89%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.83%
Sandisk Corp 0.82%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 95.7%
Holdings 230 105
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $110.4bn

FBCG and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-25D666EB97

FBCG and QQQM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 48% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.