Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to VONG's +1.1%; 59% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and VONG

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and $47.1bn for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; VONG is 6.2 times larger.

FBCG vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common59%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG VONG
Return
Total return edge FBCG +197.7% +170.9%
Annualized edge FBCG (slight) +18.6% +16.9%
Price return edge FBCG +197.2% +159.0%
Risk
Volatility edge VONG 23.9% 20.1%
Max drawdown edge VONG −42.6% −32.5%
Downside capture 126.3% 99.8%
Beta 1.39 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VONG (slight) 0.71 0.72
Sortino edge VONG (slight) 1.09 1.12
Treynor 0.121 0.151
Calmar edge VONG 0.44 0.52
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.76
Information ratio 0.26 0.11
Tracking error 11.2% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FBCG returned more: +197.7% to +170.9%. VONG swung less: 20.1% to 23.9%. VONG fell less at its worst: −32.5% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+170.9%FBCGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+16.9%FBCG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+159.0%FBCGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%20.1%VONGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%13.0%VONGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−32.5%VONGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.390.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.851.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.72VONG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.12VONG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.52VONGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

59%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VONG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

59% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG VONG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 15.63%
APPLE INC 9.31% 7.65%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 5.88%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 5.59%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 4.79%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 3.83%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 3.52%
TESLA INC 1.28% 3.04%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 2.92%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85% 1.31%
GE VERNOVA INC 0.77% 0.75%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.97% 0.68%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.64%
WELLTOWER INC 0.62%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC 0.57%
Only in VONG
Eli Lilly & Co 2.71%
General Electric Co 0.95%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.75%
Sandisk Corp 0.74%
Amphenol Corp 0.61%
Amgen Inc 0.47%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 0.42%
Booking Holdings Inc 0.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 95.5%
Holdings 230 373
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.6bn $47.1bn

FBCG and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-D7261F56CB

FBCG and VONG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.4 points.
  3. Cost. FBCG charges 0.57% of assets a year and VONG 0.06%, a gap of 0.51 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.