Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs SPYG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SPYG's +12.2%; 58% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and SPYG

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $55.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+12.2%
SPYG total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.04%
SPYG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPYG costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points; SPYG is 7.4 times larger.

FBCG vs SPYG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSPYG
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+12.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20264.1%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.04%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$56.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common58%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%59.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG SPYG
Return
Total return edge FBCG (slight) +197.7% +186.2%
Annualized edge FBCG (slight) +18.6% +17.9%
Price return edge FBCG +197.2% +171.6%
Risk
Volatility edge SPYG 23.9% 19.8%
Max drawdown edge SPYG −42.6% −31.9%
Downside capture 126.3% 103.2%
Beta 1.39 1.05
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPYG (slight) 0.71 0.78
Sortino edge SPYG (slight) 1.09 1.20
Treynor 0.121 0.074
Calmar edge SPYG 0.44 0.56
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year −1.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 −1.00
Information ratio 0.26 −0.11
Tracking error 11.2% 5.6%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; SPYG against IVW, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FBCG returned slightly more: +197.7% to +186.2%. SPYG swung less: 19.8% to 23.9%. SPYG fell less at its worst: −31.9% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs SPYG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSPYGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+186.2%FBCG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+17.9%FBCG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+171.6%FBCGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%19.8%SPYGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%12.8%SPYGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−31.9%SPYGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%104.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%103.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.05Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.78SPYG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.20SPYG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.074Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.56SPYGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVWThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year−1.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.70−1.00Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−3.2% to +1.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.26−0.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%5.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

58%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SPYG hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

58% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG SPYG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 14.61%
APPLE INC 9.31% 7.01%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 5.21%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 10.93%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 4.51%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86% 3.65%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 3.79%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 2.90%
TESLA INC 1.28% 1.97%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 2.53%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85% 0.92%
GE VERNOVA INC 0.77% 0.66%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.59%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.80%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
ASTERA LABS INC 0.64%
Only in SPYG
ELI LILLY + CO 2.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 2.80%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 1.68%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON 1.06%
RTX CORP 0.73%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.64%
AMPHENOL CORP CL A 0.53%
SANDISK CORP 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +12.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +12.1% (IVW)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO +0.1 pts vs IVW
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 100.0%
Holdings 230 152
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SPYG as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $55.9bn

FBCG and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6424C48313

FBCG and SPYG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and SPYG follows S&P 500 Growth Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and SPYG +12.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.7 points.
  3. Cost. FBCG charges 0.57% of assets a year and SPYG 0.04%, a gap of 0.53 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPYG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPYG

SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 152 positions, with the top ten at 59.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SPYG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SPYG +12.2%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SPYG?
SPYG is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against SPYG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-spyg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.