Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SCHG's +6.8%; 52% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and SCHG

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points.

FBCG vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.04%
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$7.6bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common52%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG SCHG
Return
Total return edge FBCG (slight) +197.7% +193.2%
Annualized edge Tie +18.6% +18.3%
Price return edge FBCG (slight) +197.2% +184.2%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHG 23.9% 20.9%
Max drawdown edge SCHG −42.6% −34.2%
Downside capture 126.3% 108.1%
Beta 1.39 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG (slight) 0.71 0.76
Sortino edge SCHG (slight) 1.09 1.19
Treynor 0.121 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.44 0.54
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.65
Information ratio 0.26 0.40
Tracking error 11.2% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FBCG returned slightly more: +197.7% to +193.2%. SCHG swung less: 20.9% to 23.9%. SCHG fell less at its worst: −34.2% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+193.2%FBCG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+18.3%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+184.2%FBCG (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%20.9%SCHGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%13.4%SCHGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−34.2%SCHGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.76SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.19SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.54SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

52%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SCHG hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

52% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG SCHG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 10.67%
APPLE INC 9.31% 9.29%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86% 5.07%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 7.52%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 3.97%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 3.50%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 2.51%
TESLA INC 1.28% 2.37%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 2.37%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85% 1.83%
GE VERNOVA INC 0.77% 0.93%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68% 1.36%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.59%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.97%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.80%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
Only in SCHG
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
General Electric Co 1.35%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 0.88%
Linde PLC 0.87%
Walt Disney Co 0.72%
Blackrock Inc 0.64%
Booking Holdings Inc 0.59%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 94.7%
Holdings 230 192
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $7.6bn $63.0bn

FBCG and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B04B152E37

FBCG and SCHG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.7 points.
  3. Cost. FBCG charges 0.57% of assets a year and SCHG 0.04%, a gap of 0.53 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.