Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs VOOG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to VOOG's +12.1%; 59% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and VOOG

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and $27.8bn for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+12.1%
VOOG total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.05%
VOOG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOOG costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; VOOG is 3.7 times larger.

FBCG vs VOOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGVOOG
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+12.1%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20264.1%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.05%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$27.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common59%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%60.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG VOOG
Return
Total return edge FBCG (slight) +197.7% +185.8%
Annualized edge FBCG (slight) +18.6% +17.9%
Price return edge FBCG +197.2% +172.1%
Risk
Volatility edge VOOG 23.9% 19.8%
Max drawdown edge VOOG −42.6% −32.0%
Downside capture 126.3% 99.7%
Beta 1.39 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VOOG (slight) 0.71 0.77
Sortino edge VOOG (slight) 1.09 1.19
Treynor 0.121 0.151
Calmar edge VOOG 0.44 0.56
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.33
Information ratio 0.26 0.06
Tracking error 11.2% 0.9%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; VOOG against IVW, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FBCG returned slightly more: +197.7% to +185.8%. VOOG swung less: 19.8% to 23.9%. VOOG fell less at its worst: −32.0% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs VOOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGVOOGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+185.8%FBCG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+17.9%FBCG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+172.1%FBCGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%19.8%VOOGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%12.8%VOOGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−32.0%VOOGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%99.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.851.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.77VOOG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.19VOOG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.56VOOGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVWThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.33Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−0.4% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.06Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%0.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

59%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VOOG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

59% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG VOOG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 15.01%
APPLE INC 9.31% 6.60%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 5.48%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 10.34%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 4.54%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86% 3.52%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 4.34%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 3.27%
TESLA INC 1.28% 1.68%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 2.71%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85% 0.81%
GE VERNOVA INC 0.77% 0.69%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.59%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.80%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
ASTERA LABS INC 0.64%
Only in VOOG
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.52%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.62%
Johnson & Johnson 1.02%
Sandisk Corp 0.69%
RTX Corp 0.68%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.61%
Amphenol Corp 0.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +12.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +12.1% (IVW)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO 0.0 pts vs IVW
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 99.8%
Holdings 230 154
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.6bn $27.8bn

FBCG and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6DF32633D3

FBCG and VOOG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and VOOG follows S&P 500 Growth Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and VOOG +12.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.6 points.
  3. Cost. FBCG charges 0.57% of assets a year and VOOG 0.05%, a gap of 0.52 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VOOG

VOOG tracks the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 154 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VOOG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and VOOG +12.1%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VOOG?
VOOG is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against VOOG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-voog

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.