FELG vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
FELG and QQQM hold 54% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned +18.0% over the year. Net assets: $5.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF, and $108.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
QQQM costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.2 points; QQQM is 9.5 times larger.
| FELG | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Feb 29, 2024 | $2.3bn | $22.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +18.0% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Holdings in common | 54% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 54.6% | 47.2% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FELG and QQQM hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
54% in common
On the same fields
FELG and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FELG
FELG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 142 positions, with the top ten at 54.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.9% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.2%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FELG or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FELG returned +6.8% and QQQM +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FELG or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FELG against QQQM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felg-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FELG against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felg-vs-qqqm
[FELG against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felg-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.