CGDV vs SUSL: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGDV and SUSL hold 23% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $38.9bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF.

SUSL costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; CGDV is far larger, $38.9bn against $1.2bn.

CGDV vs SUSL: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDVSUSL
Expense ratio0.33%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$38.9bn$1.2bn
Total return, 1 year+18.5%+18.9%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index
Holdings in common23%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.7%49.6%
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.5%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+18.9%
SUSL total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.10%
SUSL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and SUSL hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

23% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGDV SUSL
Microsoft Corp 5.81% 10.70%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66% 14.94%
Alphabet Inc 3.59% 5.85%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% 2.68%
Mastercard Inc 1.30% 1.35%
Amgen Inc 0.79% 0.63%
Linde PLC 1.95% 0.63%
Salesforce Inc 0.92% 0.52%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.42% 0.49%
Union Pacific Corp 2.12% 0.47%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.80% 0.37%
Comcast Corp 1.75% 0.21%
Only in CGDV
Broadcom Inc 5.16%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%
General Electric Co 3.08%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83%
RTX Corp 2.82%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%
Only in SUSL
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.61%
TESLA INC 3.10%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.81%
VISA CLASS A 1.81%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.78%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 1.19%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.14%
LAM RESEARCH 1.13%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +18.5% +18.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) not published
Gap to its benchmark −7.9 pts vs IWD not available
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 91.0% 98.4%
Holdings 53 251
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 8, 2026 and SUSL as of Oct 9, 2026 $38.9bn $1.2bn

CGDV and SUSL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CGDV

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About SUSL

SUSL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 251 positions, with the top ten at 49.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SUSL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.5% and SUSL +18.9%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or SUSL?
SUSL is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and SUSL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 98% of SUSL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against SUSL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-susl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.