DYNF vs SUSL: Differences, Returns & Fees

DYNF and SUSL hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned +19.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $42.9bn for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and $1.2bn for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF.

SUSL costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; DYNF is far larger, $42.9bn against $1.2bn.

DYNF vs SUSL: Differences, Returns & Fees
DYNFSUSL
Expense ratio0.26%0.10%
Net assets$42.9bn$1.2bn
Total return, 1 year+19.6%+18.9%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index
Holdings in common41%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund41.0%49.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+19.6%
DYNF total return, 1 year
+18.9%
SUSL total return, 1 year
0.26%
DYNF expense ratio
0.10%
SUSL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SUSL hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

41% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DYNF SUSL
NVIDIA 8.39% 14.94%
MICROSOFT 5.08% 10.70%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.48% 5.85%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.05% 4.61%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.96% 1.78%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.77% 2.81%
TESLA INC 1.57% 3.10%
ELI LILLY 1.21% 2.68%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.31% 1.14%
LAM RESEARCH 1.61% 1.13%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.61% 1.04%
GE VERNOVA 0.57% 0.77%
Only in DYNF
APPLE 7.73%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.18%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.74%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.65%
BROADCOM INC 2.55%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.89%
BANK OF AMERICA 1.85%
Only in SUSL
LINDE PLC 0.63%
BLACKROCK 0.45%
S&P GLOBAL 0.35%
LOWES COMPANIES INC 0.30%
EQUINIX REIT 0.29%
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS 0.28%
STRYKER 0.27%
SYNOPSYS 0.26%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +19.6% +18.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.9% (PBUS) not published
Gap to its benchmark +2.6 pts vs PBUS not available
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 94.8% 98.4%
Holdings 261 251
Net assets $42.9bn $1.2bn

DYNF and SUSL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DYNF

DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.9% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 261 positions, with the top ten at 41.0%.

About SUSL

SUSL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 251 positions, with the top ten at 49.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SUSL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +19.6% and SUSL +18.9%.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or SUSL?
SUSL is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and SUSL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DYNF and 98% of SUSL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYNF against SUSL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-susl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.