CGDV vs GSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGDV and GSLC hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned +18.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $38.9bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $15.3bn for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF.

GSLC costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points; CGDV is 2.6 times larger.

CGDV vs GSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDVGSLC
Expense ratio0.33%0.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$38.9bn$15.3bn
Total return, 1 year+18.5%+14.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index
Holdings in common33%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.7%36.1%
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

+18.5%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+14.8%
GSLC total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.09%
GSLC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and GSLC hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

half

33% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGDV GSLC
NVIDIA Corp 5.66% 7.87%
Microsoft Corp 5.81% 4.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.59% 3.31%
Broadcom Inc 5.16% 2.84%
Apple Inc 2.36% 7.00%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% 2.14%
Amazon.com Inc 1.88% 3.78%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% 1.17%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.89% 1.10%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.34% 0.62%
Mastercard Inc 1.30% 0.61%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02% 0.59%
Only in CGDV
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%
Starbucks Corp 2.26%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.16%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.02%
TC Energy Corp 1.33%
Smurfit Westrock PLC 1.03%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.82%
Only in GSLC
ALPHABET INC 1.89%
TESLA INC 1.28%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.10%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 0.84%
WALMART INC 0.84%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.73%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.71%
VISA INC 0.70%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +18.5% +14.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) not published
Gap to its benchmark −7.9 pts vs IWD not available
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 91.0% 95.2%
Holdings 53 435
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $38.9bn $15.3bn

CGDV and GSLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CGDV

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About GSLC

GSLC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 435 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or GSLC?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.5% and GSLC +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or GSLC?
GSLC is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and GSLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 95% of GSLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against GSLC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-gslc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.