Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs NOBL: how they differ
CGDV and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGDV | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.72% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.69% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.69% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.68% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | TARGET CORP 1.64% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | CHEVRON CORP 1.61% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | GENUINE PARTS CO 1.61% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | MEDTRONIC PLC 1.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital Group | ProShares |
| What it is | Dividend Value | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 69 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 11, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or NOBL?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against NOBL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-nobl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources