Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to NOBL's +15.5%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and NOBL
Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGDV costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; CGDV is 3.3 times larger.
| Measure | CGDV | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +15.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $39.1bn | $11.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returnsCGDV returned more: +107.2% to +38.7%. CGDV and NOBL swung about the same: 14.8% and 14.7%. NOBL fell less at its worst: −16.5% to −21.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGDV | NOBL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +107.2% | +38.7% | CGDV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.9% | +7.3% | CGDV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +93.0% | +25.6% | CGDV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 14.8% | 14.7% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.8% | 10.2% | CGDV (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −21.1% | −16.5% | NOBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.85 | 0.27 | CGDV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.28 | 0.38 | CGDV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.80 | 0.44 | CGDV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and NOBL hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
10% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and NOBL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
- Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- Size. CGDV has $39.1bn in net assets and NOBL $11.7bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); CGDV is 3.3 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or NOBL?
- CGDV is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-nobl
[CGDV against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.