Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWI vs CGDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWI returned +13.4% to CGDV's +15.8%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWI and CGDV
Net assets: $33.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
ACWI costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.4 points; CGDV is 1.2 times larger.
| Measure | ACWI | CGDV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +15.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $32.6bn | $38.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.9% | 42.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and CGDV hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
29% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWI and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI and CGDV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ACWI follows MSCI ACWI and CGDV follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 29% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ACWI returned +13.4% and CGDV +15.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ACWI
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,197 positions, with the top ten at 24.9%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or CGDV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +13.4% and CGDV +15.8%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or CGDV?
- ACWI is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against CGDV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-cgdv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWI against CGDV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-cgdv
[ACWI against CGDV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-cgdv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.